Skip to content

Main Navigation

Exaggerated Reaction to Novelty and Preclinical Cognitive Decline

Early detection of abnormal cognitive decline is important (Evans, Grodstein, Loewenstein, Kaye, & Weintraub, 2011; Sperling et al., 2011). However, the challenge is not to identify individuals who already show measurable cognitive change (i.e., Mild Cognitive Impairment; MCI), but rather to identify those individuals who appear cognitively normal, but are at an increased risk for imminent cognitive deterioration. Identifying such individuals is important because pre-clinical cognitive decline is associated with functional decline (Rajan, Hebert, Scherr, Mendes de Leon, & Evans, 2013; Riddle, McQuoid, Potter, Steffens, & Taylor, 2015), placing individuals at risk for serious functional mistakes in daily life (e.g., mismanagement of medications, falls, etc.; Degrauw, Annest, Stevens, Xu, & Coronado, 2016; Plehn, Marcopulos, & McLain, 2004; U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 2003). This risk is compounded when physicians and family members are not aware of the covert changes in a patient’s cognition.

The principal barrier to progress in this research is that most individuals can compensate for subtle declines in cognition (Buckner, 2004; Clément & Belleville, 2010). Such compensation is particularly successful within the structured format of neuropsychological testing (Kenworthy, Yerys, Anthony, & Wallace, 2008), allowing cognitively-declining patients to produce performances that are indistinguishable from those of neurocognitively-healthy peers (Mortimer, Borenstein, Gosche, & Snowdon, 2005). These issues are further complicated by the fact that the degree of compensation varies among people, reflecting individual differences in cognitive and neural reserves (Stern, 2009; Tucker & Stern, 2011). Thus, typical risk factors (e.g., genetic background, neurodegenerative changes) are not adequate for predicting when, or whether, a person will decline cognitively (Bertram, Lill, & Tanzi, 2010; Crystal et al., 1988).

The projects in the Executive Lab that investigate preclinical cognitive decline have focused on  a promising marker of incipient cognitive decline: exaggerated reaction to novelty. In prior work, we have shown that two different approaches to operationalizing exaggerated reaction to novelty can serve as predictors of incipient cognitive decline: (a) novelty-induced increases in action (or “motor”) planning latencies (Suchy, Kraybill, & Franchow, 2011), and (b) decreases in Openness to experience (Williams, Suchy, & Kraybill, 2013).  Furthermore, we have shown that these two markers together account for between 13% to 18% of variance in cognitive change above and beyond other typical neuropsychological predictors of decline among older adults, such as memory tests, dementia screening measures, and depressive symptoms (Suchy, Franchow, Neirmeyer, Ziemnik, Williams, Pennington, in press).

Recent Articles on Exaggerated Reaction to Novelty and Preclinical Cognitive Decline

(students supervised as co-authors are italicized)

 

  1. Suchy, Y., Franchow, E.I., Niermeyer, M.A., Ziemnik, R.,Williams, P.G., & Pennington, N. (in press). Exaggerated reaction to novelty as a predictor of incipient cognitive decline among community dwelling older adults.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology.
  2. Thorgusen, S., & Suchy, Y. , Chelune, G.J., & Baucom, B.R. (2016). Neuropsychological Practice Effects in the Context of Cognitive Decline: Contributions from Learning and Task Novelty. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 22(4), 453-466.
  3. Suchy, Y. Euler, M. & Eastvold, A. (2014).  Exaggerated reaction to novelty as a subclinical consequence of mild traumatic brain injury.  Brain Injury, 44(9), 2147-2161. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2014.888766
  4. Williams, P.G., Suchy, Y., and Kraybill, M. (2013). Preliminary evidence for low openness to experience as a pre-clinical marker of incipient cognitive decline in older adults. Journal for Research in Personality.
  5. Suchy, Y., Kraybill, M., Franchow, E. (2011). Practice effects and beyond: Reaction to novelty as an independent predictor of cognitive decline among older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17, 101-111.

 

Last Updated: 10/8/20